|
|
By The Badger, on August 2nd, 2011 
(Excerpt From Under the Rocks They Crept) Well, we see that Judge Holland doesn’t mind a little backdoor action, so why in the heck would he fault the same type of crimes by the Merced County Boys? Holland does the same thing himself. Obviously, Holland didn’t feel that a reasonable person would be able to see how full of horse-poop his ruling is, and/or better yet, as far as he thinks, there is nothing that a person can do about what he did. Holland is great at mocking me without disproving what I am saying or ever referring to the evidence presented him that proves he is lying through his teeth. Holland instead cherry picks my words referring to a judicial assistant as a “judicial whore of Babylon,” my using the word “cabal,” and referring to fellow Italian American, Leon Panetta, as a lying little Italian. My, my, what sensitive ears you have, said little Red Riding Hood to the Big Bad Wolf. . . . → Read More: Judge Lesley Holland, affronted by the word cabal, judicial whore of Babylon, lying Italian. No problem with the word “dyke”?
By The Badger, on July 31st, 2011 
(Excerpt) The Monterey Herald, not wanting to miss the opportunity to smear me without my side of the story, printed “Recall Candidate Jailed For Contempt”. I later took the depositions of attorneys Mr. Anthony Lombardo, who represents Clint Eastwood, and Mr. Michael Stamp, a very respected constitutional attorney in Monterey, who were present when O’Farrell arrested me for contempt. They both testified that they did not see me do anything disrespectful to the court. They noted that I was speaking in a calm manner, and that it was Judge O’Farrell who lost it. Notwithstanding such fact, Judge O’Farrell put me in handcuffs to sit in the jury’s box for about three hours while he finished his scheduled hearings, then convened a trial of me for direct contempt of him. The laws state that when there is no immediacy, i.e., a jury is waiting, that a judge who is personally embroiled with a party should get another judge to hear a contempt hearing, but Judge O’Farrell wanted to punish me. I was not given the opportunity to have an attorney, and was forced to present my defense to him for not being in contempt while handcuffed behind my back. Judge O’Farrell acknowledged that it was he who was interrupting me when I was trying to serve him with the CCP 170.6, which he also acknowledged that he accepted. Thereafter, the disqualified Judge O’Farrell, while looking like a deer stuck in headlights, sent me to jail for the rest of the day. . . . → Read More: The Count of Monterey Cristo, aka The AttorneyBuster Returns
By The Badger, on July 28th, 2011 
Michael Ruiz, father of the person who was killed by Dylan Morse, reflected on his experience in July when he watched Gnoss sentence Morse the first time, and then waits again in December 2009. Michael and Lydia Ruiz wait outside the courtroom for Morse’s sentence reduction hearing. “The man behind the bench on Wednesday was unrecognizable to me,” Ruiz wrote in an e-mail. “Clearly, it was a difficult decision to make, but the Judge Gnoss of July 15 spoke with conviction of the strong message that needed to be sent to the community, while on Dec. 2, an apologetic man was barely audible and utterly unconvincing, as if struggling to believe his own words, while contending that the reduced sentence ‘will still send a message.’” I submit that Judge Gnoss could not believe the words he was speaking because he was being forced to say them. I’ve seen that look before on judges that were caught either having to do the right thing, or to close their eyes and do the wrong thing for fellow public officials. It’s a career decision. It is my position that Morse agreed to file charges against me and take the first line of heat in exchange for Chief Ronald George, Leon Panetta, past Attorney General Bill Lockyer dropping the dime on Judge Gnoss…and I have documented it in court filings. . . . → Read More: Mystery of Judge Gnoss’ Dramatic Sentence Reduction of Dylan Morse’s Vehicular Manslaughter Solved?
By The Badger, on July 28th, 2011 
I’ve been around for quite some time and was way ahead of the curve knowing what these good ol’ boy public officials were heading us into. I walked away from my career when I was making close to $600,000.00 a year as a professional high level retained headhunter. It was the right thing to do to make sure I was not crushed by some unethical un-American treasonous bastards in Leon Panetta’s club and backyard. When San Joaquin Judge Lesley Holland scoffs at me saying the big people at the top are not concerned about the information I have on them, it shows him to absolutely delusional in believing so. Who’s he trying to kid? . . . → Read More: KRLA AttorneyBusters Radio: Do You Think The Government Knows Who I am?
By The Badger, on July 28th, 2011 
DPS Agents Scott Millspaugh and Mark Maniord were staking out my house in Los Banos the day after I had published as required by law the Certified Petition of Intent to Recall Mayor Tommy Jones in the newspaper. They said their visit did not have anything to do with the Recall but specifically with a sentence in my appeal documents filed with the Sixth Appellate Court over 18 months before in the case of Forte vs. Albov (Albov being my previous attorney). I highlighted, in an issue of the Badger Flats Gazette, a letter documenting their visit and my request for a copy of the report of their findings (which has not been responded to). It laid out clearly the involvement of Chief Justice Ronald George and Bill Lockyer trying to conceal the corruption I uncovered in Monterey County, home turf of political power broker, shill, and presidential schemer, Leon Panetta. Respected Monterey appellate attorney, Charles Warner, was designated as the expert legal witness for Lichtenegger in the trial that was dismissed after I made my opening statement. Warner said afterwords that my case should not have been dismissed, that his testimony would not have helped Lichtenegger, and that it is obvious that I have been wronged by the Monterey justice system for a number of years. Monterey attorneys know who I am from my attempt to bring to light the matters through my radio program AttorneyBusters.com. It was aired on KSCO, Santa Cruz. Attorneys couldn’t wait to hear the next program. No kidding! I developed a cult following among the legal profession known for exposing the relationships that were behind court decisions. After a couple of years, I moved the program to KRLA the second largest talk radio station in Los Angeles and broadcast on Sundays for an hour. . . . → Read More: Shattering the Illusion of the Fair Tribunal: Winning 2.3 Appeals in Two Appellate Districts
By The Badger, on July 28th, 2011 
What should one expect of Judge Holland who got his robe into a twister with his judicial buddy Judge Michael E. Platt who was thrown off the bench for fixing traffic tickets and cases for his friends? The following is taken from Metropolitan News-Enterprise, Tuesday, August 6th, 2002: “The judge (Platt) also acknowledged that he had contacted other San Joaquin judicial officers about three cases—a juvenile dependency matter, a traffic case, and a theft charge. In the dependency case, Platt admitted telephoning Judge Lesley Holland to talk about a case involving the family of a former client, then entering a courtroom through a side door while the matter was being heard. Platt denied that he was attempting to influence the outcome of the case, and the commission concluded that he ‘was not consciously attempting’ to do so. But he violated the Code of Judicial Ethics by engaging in an ex parte communication with another judge, the commission ruled.” What about Judge Holland? It takes two to ex parte(y)….BABY! Well, we see that Judge Holland doesn’t mind a little backdoor action, so why in the heck would he fault the same type of crimes by the Merced County Boys? Holland does the same thing himself. . . . → Read More: From Under The Rocks They Crept: San Joaquin County Judge Lesley Holland Denies CCP 170.3 Against Judge Ronald Hansen
By The Badger, on July 23rd, 2011 
Meet Aubree and Dylan, just a couple of fun loving drunk kids that killed some people. Little did they know how their paths would meet, and what a twisted path it would be that led to me, Gene Forte, to untangle. It brings together the tragic death of Alex Ruiz at the hands of Dylan Morse up in Sonoma County and that of the two victims of Aubree Hogue in Merced County. It brings to question, if the victims of Hogue had been migrant farm workers or illegal immigrants, instead of sailors, would they have been given as much consideration and publicity in the Merced Sun Star, and would Aubree have received what attorneys say was a harsh sentence in comparison to Dylan Morse, son of the DA that prosecuted her? It brings together DA Larry Morse and Richard Hogue, fathers with the same pain, but from a different position in the spectrum. It brings together how I am being falsely prosecuted by DA Morse to save his son. It grows darker and should be of grave importance to you. It brings to light the connection of Mr. Leon Panetta, Secretary of Defense from Monterey County, and me where I put seven of his crony judges into retirement. It brings to light his influence connected now to Judge Gnoss’ bizarre sentence reduction for Dylan to thwart me. . . . → Read More: Unequal Justice: How Far Would A Father Go? (The Story of Aubree Hogue & Dylan Morse)
By The Badger, on July 23rd, 2011 
(Excerpt: Supplement in The Interest of Justice) Plaintiff [Forte] has long contended that the gross anomalies of the court not following proper procedures were not accidents or mindless mistakes but an intentional thwarting of plaintiff’s rights under the color of law emanating from the need to cover up the false prosecution of him by District Attorney Larry Morse for allegedly attacking a pro tem judge, James Pico Padron. As par for the course of the biased disqualified Merced Superior Court, Judge Brian McCabe ordered Merced Superior Court clerks not to take phone calls from plaintiff and destroy any faxed letters without reading them. McCabe’s edict was issued to Forte after Forte sent a total of four letters between March 7th and June 13th, 2011, and called and spoke to a judicial assistant, Ms. Melanie Myers, once. As plaintiff [Forte] has already indicated, Judge McCabe and Judge Hansen’s purpose inhibiting Forte’s communications with the court was so that they could continue to say they knew nothing about the retaliatory prosecution and the absolute cabal by public officials against Forte. Judge David Allen’s clarification that all Merced County Bench judges have been disqualified from Forte’s cases also indicates that Judge Brian McCabe had no business whatsoever signing an order letting Ms. Barbara O’Neill abandon Forte without a noticed motion, with a trial date pending. It was unconscionable and prejudicial. . . . → Read More: CCP 170.3 Against Judge Hansen Update: Merced Court Ruling When Disqualified from Forte’s Cases (nothing wrong about that LOL)
By The Badger, on July 20th, 2011 
Like a bolt of lightning on April 7th, 2011, I was contacted by Grand Juror Tomsha who informed me that because I spoke on the radio program in Monterey on Saturday that the Merced County Counsel James Fincher said that the jurors had to re-vote the investigation to terminate it. Tomsha said that Fincher said that I had broken the confidentiality of the grand jury and that it could be a misdemeanor. Tomsha told me that the County Counsel had received a package from an unknown person in Monterey County who had heard me on the radio program. Tomsha said that due to this, the Merced County Counsel James Fincher and/or Richard Flores (Assistant County Counsel) said the investigation must be terminated because a vote would need to be taken to exclude subjects to the complaint such as himself and the District Attorney’s Office. It was Fincher’s way of getting themselves and the other public officials out of the complaint by creating an adversarial position between me and the Grand Jury. When I got over the shock, I then confirmed with Tomsha what she already knew. The Merced County Counsel could not advise them to do anything concerning the complaint that concerned themselves, and that I did not owe the Grand Juror any oath of confidentiality. . . . → Read More: The 2011 Merced County Grand Jury Hoax!
By The Badger, on July 19th, 2011 
(EXCERPT OF LETTER TO JUDGE MCCABE) Re: Second Return of Letter with Exhibits & Your Judicial Whore of Babylon Dear Brian, On June 8th, 2011, I had served upon you by a registered process server a letter dated May 25th, 2011, along with a cover letter dated June 8th, 2011. The letters are not ex parte communications. You are not a judge, by any stretch of the imagination, on any cases that I have before the disqualified Merced County Superior Court. Notwithstanding such fact, your judicial assistant, Ms. Melanie Myers, has now returned the information that was served you on June 8th, 2011. Upon contacting Ms. Myers this morning and asking her why she returned the information, she told me that it was an ex parte communication. I then explained to Ms. Myers that it was not, and why it was not. Ms. Myers then became confrontational because she was unable to come up with a cognizant reason why she just did what she was apparently told by you. She sounded like a parrot speaking words not knowing what they meant. . . . → Read More: MERCED COURT JUDGE BRIAN MCCABE ORDERS FORTE NOT TO CALL OR FAX COURT?
|
|
